|
Military planners in the late 1920s characterized the army as the central
agent of Brazilian national unity and greatness. They believed that economic
development, military preparedness, and national power were linked tightly. The
national territory held immeasurable resources that had to be protected from
covetous foreigners until Brazilians could exploit them. They pointed to Japan
and Argentina as examples of countries building military and economic power
simultaneously. Reformist officers (called "Young Turks" after the
military reformers of Turkey) thought that the lack of national cohesion was a
far greater threat to Brazil than was any foreign threat. The army, in their
view, was the only instrument to hold the country together by being a school of
citizenship, and by teaching the superiority of the collective over individual
good in sacrifice for the motherland. Meanwhile, Brazilians of all classes fled
from military service, and draft dodging was chronic.
Even so, obligatory military service resulted in the physical expansion of
the army, which eventually gave it the ability to intervene in politics and in
society more profoundly than in the past. To give the army a local image while
eliminating the expense and supervisory burden of transporting draftees to
distant training camps, garrisons were established in every state to train them.
The new system also required expanding the number of personnel in the army
(18,000 to 25,000 in 1916-17, 30,000 in 1920, 48,000 in 1930, 93,000 in 1940);
indeed, during the Old Republic, it grew 52 percent faster than did the rapidly
growing population.
In the 1920s, an intense struggle for control of the army was in part
motivated by conflicting ideas of what the institution's role was to be in the
increasingly consolidated Brazilian nation-state. The German-trained Young Turks
sought modernization. After 1919 the French Military Mission also encouraged
professionalization and enhancement of the army's self-image as the central
institution of the Brazilian state. By 1929 the state had intensified its
centralizing powers by expanding federal ownership of the country's railroads,
shipping lines, ports, and banks. In the coffee-dominated economy, the federal
government controlled coffee marketing and sought to influence world coffee
prices. However, some officers were troubled by who was running the state and
army during the presidencies of Venceslau Brás Pereira Gomes (1914-18), Delphim
Moreira da Costa Ribeiro (acting, 1918-19), and Epitácio da Silva Pessôa
(1919-22).
The lieutenants' rebellions (tenentismo --see Glossary) of the 1920s
were complicated in that they involved a minority of officers who were as much
in revolt against the army hierarchy as against the central government. There
was to be no amnesty, and so faced with either giving up their careers or
continuing to conspire, the tenentes chose the latter. The result was
the 1924 uprising in São Paulo and Rio Grande do Sul, which led to the retreat
of the tenentes into the interior and the long campaign of the Prestes
Column, named after the romantic revolutionary Luis Carlos Prestes, across
Brazil until it gave up and entered Bolivia in 1927. In that decade, many of the
best of the officer corps became rebels to save their careers and to save the
army from corrupt officers. Thus, during the 1920s, the army institution played
a conservative role, while a determined, talented minority of its officer corps
pursued revolution.
|