 |
The early reaction of the Salvadoran radical left to the progression of
reformist junta governments was characteristically fractious. The PCES expressed
initial support for the first junta. Other groups, such as the ERP, condemned
such impulses as collaborationist and renewed their call for an insurrection.
Although some dialogue apparently took place between Colonel Majano and his
supporters and some members of the radical left, the erosion of Majano's
position within the military and the inability of the junta governments to stem
the tide of right-wing violence, not to mention a certain suspicion among the
Majanists themselves of the leftists' ultimate goals, worked against any effort
to incorporate them into the governmental structure. Some observers have noted
this failure to bring the left into the political process as a major shortcoming
of the reformist juntas. It appears, however, that the political will to do so
was lacking on both sides. This was particularly true of the Marxist guerrilla
groups that had expanded their membership and their aspirations since their
establishment as urban terrorist cells in the mid-1970s.
Foreign influences on these Salvadoran guerrilla groups served in large part
to convince their leadership of the need to sublimate old ideological quarrels
in favor of a coordinated and cooperative effort to arouse the Salvadoran
masses. The example of the Nicaraguan revolution served as both an inspiration
and a loose blueprint for the Salvadorans. Nicaragua demonstrated the importance
of incorporating as many sectors of society as possible into a revolutionary
movement while still ensuring the predominance of a Marxist-Leninist
"vanguard" group within the coalition. ...Clearly, several
ideologically diverse (Maoist, pro-Soviet, and pro-Cuban) guerrilla groups could
not fulfill simultaneously the role of revolutionary vanguard. Salvadorans
recognized a need for unity that was not achieved until Cuba's Fidel Castro took
a direct hand in the matter. The negotiating process began in Havana in December
1979, some two months after the reformist coup in El Salvador, and was concluded
by May 1980, when the major guerrilla groups announced their unity under the
banner of the Unified Revolutionary Directorate (Direccion Revolucionario
Unificada-- DRU). Despite some continued infighting, the DRU succeeded in
coordinating the groups' efforts to organize and equip their forces.
While the military strategy of the left was proceeding along one path, some
opposition parties and the mass organizations were following a similar and
eventually convergent course. On April 1, 1980, the Revolutionary Democratic
Front (Frente Democratico Revolucionario--FDR) was established by the CRM, the
umbrella group of the mass organizations. It brought together all five of the
mass organizations associated with the DRU guerrilla groups as well as Ungo's
MNR, Zamora's MPSC, another party known as the Popular Liberation Movement (Movimiento
de Liberacion Popular-- MLP), forty-nine labor unions, and several student
groups. FDR political leaders such as Ungo and Zamora began to travel abroad,
where they found political and moral support, particularly in Mexico and among
the social democratic parties of Western Europe. Meanwhile, the mass
organizations began a campaign of general strikes in an effort to pave the way
for a full or partial leftist assumption of power, either through insurrection
or through negotiations.
In November 1980, the FDR was struck a traumatic blow when one of its
leaders, Enrique Alvarez, was killed along with five other members of the front
by a right-wing death squad. This incident underscored the danger of the FDR's
strategy of open organization and opposition and contributed to its formal
unification with the DRU. Although the leadership of the mass organizations had
long been cooperating with the guerrilla groups, the politicians of the MNR and
MPSC had sought to steer a slightly more independent path. After the Alvarez
murder, however, they felt compelled to make common cause with the DRU; they
took this action not only for their own protection but also because they
believed that the prevailing level of violence in the country legitimized a
violent response. By 1981 the FDR had been united formally with the Farabundo
Marti National Liberation Front (Frente Farabundo Marti de Liberacion
Nacional--FMLN), the successor organization to the DRU. The first public
announcement of the FMLN-FDR was made in Mexico City in January 1981, some four
days after the FMLN guerrollas initiated an operation that they dubbed,
prematurely and inaccurately, the "final offensive."
The guerrilla offensive began on January 10, 1981. From the perspective of
the FMLN, its timing proved to be premature in a number of respects. The
guerrillas' logistics network was not prepared to support an operation on an
almost countrywide level; the rebels generally were not well armed and clearly
were not well trained. The Salvadoran armed forces, although initially taken by
surprise, were sufficiently cohesive to rally and beat back the guerrilla
attacks. The FMLN hoped to establish operational control over Morazan Department
and to declare it a "liberated territory." This major objective never
was achieved. On a basic level, the final offensive demonstrated the limited
extent of the guerrillas' support among the Salvadoran population. The
anticipated countrywide insurrection on which the FMLN had staked so much of its
hopes for victory never materialized...
Another high-impact incident was the murder of four churchwomen from the
United States in December 1980. The murders themselves drew the ire of the
United States government and public and prompted the administration of Jimmy
Carter to suspend a program of limited military aid it had granted to the junta
government (United States military aid had been rejected by the Romero
government in 1977 when the Carter administration sought to link disbursement to
human rights compliance). The subsequent investigation frustrated United States
officials, angered the American public, and enhanced the suspicion that
high-ranking officers in the security forces were orchestrating a cover-up of
the affair.
*****
While wiping out rebels, government forces errantly massacred some 750 men,
women, and children in El Mozote and surrounding hamlets in December 1981.
Leftist guerrilla rebels, supported by Cuba and Nicaragua, operated mainly in
the countryside, raiding towns, police stations, and military posts to obtain
arms and gaining control of about a third of the country. Right-wing death
squads, formed to eliminate suspected leftists, were blamed for killing
thousands of civilians, including Jesuit priests, nuns, labor organizers,
peasant leaders, alleged communists, and democratic reformers. A succession of
US-supported centrist and rightist governments failed to defeat the rebels of
the marxist-led FMLN, which rejected (1987) both the Central American peace plan
and a unilateral cease-fire by the government. By early 1989, the FMLN
guerrillas were militarily deadlocked with the Salvadoran armed forces and had
gained almost no political power. During elections in March 1989, the FMLN
mounted a bold offensive, attacking about 20 towns; the rightist Nationalist
Republican Alliance (ARENA) won control under Alfredo Cristiani (1947-). But
charges of widespread corruption continued; defiant FMLN rebels launched another
bold offensive in San Salvador in November 1989. President Cristiani then
engaged in UN-mediated negotiations for 21 months until a peace accord was
reached on January 16, 1992, followed by a permanent cease-fire on February 1.
Afterward, FMLN forces gradually disbanded, government forces were cut in half,
and political and economic reforms were instituted. The war had cost about
80,000 lives, uprooted about 1 million people, and destroyed the country's
productive infrastructure.
|