| State |
Entry |
Exit |
Combat Forces |
Population |
Losses |
| Sinhalese |
1983 |
1987 |
37600 |
14400000 |
3000 |
| Tamils |
1983 |
1987 |
10000 |
1800000 |
2000 |
Political unrest, however, escalated in the 1980s as groups representing the Tamil minority moved toward organized insurgency. Tamil bases were built up in jungle areas of the northern and eastern parts of the island and increasingly in the southern districts of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, where Tamil groups received official and unofficial support. The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) was the strongest of these, but there were other competing groups, which were sometimes hostile to each other.
The Sri Lankan government responded to the unrest by deploying forces to the north and the east, but the eruption of insurgency inflamed communal passions, and in July 1983 extensive organized anti-Tamil riots took place in Colombo and elsewhere. Sinhalese mobs systematically attacked Tamils and destroyed Tamil property, and the riots created movement of refugees within the island and from Sri Lanka to Tamil
Nadu.
The Jayawardene government, facing a simultaneous resurgence of Sinhalese militancy of the JVP, became receptive to initiatives by the Indian government. After prolonged negotiations, an accord was signed between India and Sri Lanka on July 29, 1987, that offered the Tamils an autonomous integrated northeast province within a united Sri Lanka and provided for the introduction of an Indian Peace-Keeping Force (IPKF) to enforce the terms. The Sri Lankan government, the LTTE, and the IPKF, however, disagreed over the implementation of the accord, and thus the LTTE resumed its offensive, this time against the IPKF, which was trying to disarm it.
In January 1989 Jayawardene retired and was succeeded by Premadasa, who had defeated Bandaranaike in the December 1988 elections. Premadasa negotiated a withdrawal of the IPKF, which was completed in March 1990, and the battle against Tamil insurgency was taken up by the Sri Lankan army. On May 1, 1993, Premadasa was assassinated by a suicide bomber, alleged by the security forces to be linked to the LTTE. The premier, Dingiri Banda Wijetunga, was appointed acting president.
*****
Since the early 1970s, ethnic conflict has pitted Sri Lanka's Tamil minority
against the Sinhalese majority over issues of power sharing and local autonomy.
The main combatants are the Sri Lankan army and the secessionist Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam. Indian involvement, encouraged by pro-Tamil sentiments in
its state of Tamil Nadu, which is close to Sri Lanka, and the Indian
government's covert aid to and training of Tamil militants between 1977 and
1987, drew India into the conflict. The Indo-Sri Lankan Accord, signed on July
29, 1987, committed New Delhi to deploying a peacekeeping force on the island,
making the Indian government the principal guarantor of a solution to the ethnic
violence that had heightened dramatically since 1983. Nearly 60,000 Indian
troops drawn from two divisions (one from the Central Command and the other from
the Southern Command) were in Sri Lanka as the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF)
between 1987 and 1990.
Originally sent to Sri Lanka as a neutral body with a mission to ensure
compliance with the accord, the IPKF increasingly became a partisan force
fighting against Tamils. The popularity of Indian forces, which was never high,
decreased still further amidst charges of rape and murder of civilians. Despite
the considerable experience that Indian troops had gained in fighting
insurgencies in India's northeast, the IPKF was at a marked disadvantage in Sri
Lanka. In fighting Naga and Mizo guerrillas in northeast India, the army had
fought on home ground, and the central government could couple the army's
efforts with direct political negotiations. In Sri Lanka, the Indian forces did
not possess an adequate local intelligence network. Despite the growth of the
IPKF to 70,000 strong, the predominantly urban context of northern Sri Lanka
imposed constraints on the use of force. It also is widely believed that Sri
Lankan forces offered only grudging cooperation. Given the inability of the IPKF
to prevent either Sinhalese or Tamil extremist actions, it steadily lost the
support of both sides in the conflict.
As the Sri Lankan presidential elections approached in December 1988, both
the contending parties, the ruling United National Party led by then Prime
Minister Ranasinghe Premadasa, and the three-party United Front led by former
Prime Minister Sirimavo Ratwatte Dias Bandaranaike, expressed their reservations
about the 1987 accord. Premadasa was elected, and after he was inaugurated, he
declared an end to the five-and-a-half-year state of emergency and asked India
to withdraw the IPKF. In July 1989, the IPKF started a phased withdrawal of its
remaining 45,000 troops, a process that took until March 1990 to complete.
During the three-year involvement, some 1,500 Indian troops were killed and
more than 4,500 were wounded during this operation. Another casualty resulting
from the Sri Lanka mission was the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv
Gandhi by a Tamil militant in 1991. As a participant in what began as a
peacekeeping mission, the Indian armed forces learned some valuable lessons.
These included the realization that better coordination is needed between
military and political decision makers for such missions. One of the commanders
of the IPKF also noted that training, equipment, and command and control needed
improvement.
In 1995, at the request of the Sri Lankan government, Indian naval ships and
air force surveillance aircraft established a quarantine zone around the LTTE
stronghold in the Jaffna area. The supply of military matériel by Indian
sympathizers to the Tamil insurgents in Sri Lanka from Tamil Nadu, just
thirty-five kilometers across the Palk Strait, was an ongoing problem that
continued to keep India involved in the conflict.
*****
Political and economic conflict between the Sinhalese and Tamil communities
was a problem of growing urgency in the years following independence. In the
face of an expanding Sinhalese ethnic nationalism, Tamil groups initially
expressed their grievances through legally constituted political channels,
participating in parliamentary debate through the Tamil Congress and the Federal
Party. In the early 1970s however, a number of events worked to create a new
sense of alienation, especially among Tamil youths, and a new desire to seek
redress through extralegal means. In 1970 the Ministry of Education introduced
quotas for university admission that effectively reduced the number of places
available for Tamil students. As a result, a contingent of young, educated
Tamils was cut off from the traditional path to advancement and set loose on an
economy illprepared to accommodate them.
Tamil interests received another blow in 1971 when the Constituent Assembly
met to draft a new constitution. Federal Party delegates to the assembly
proposed that the new republic be designed along federal lines to insure a large
degree of autonomy for Tamil areas. In addition, the Tamils hoped to remove the
special status that had been granted to the Sinhala language and Buddhism. The
Constituent Assembly not only rejected both of these proposals, but even denied
the minimal protection to minorities that had been guaranteed under the Soulbury
Constitution of 1946. The Tamil delegates responded by walking out of the
assembly.
The neglect of Tamil interests in the Constituent Assembly and the enactment
of the new constitution in 1972 marked a turning point in Tamil political
participation. The older generation of Tamil leaders had been discredited: their
activity in the political process had accomplished little, and the Marxist JVP
insurrection of 1971 had set a new model for political activism. Two new groups emerged as an
expression of the growing alienation and frustration in the Tamil community. The
first, the Tamil United Front, was a coalition of Tamil interest groups and
legal parties united by an urgent call for Tamil autonomy. The group espoused
nonviolent means to achieve its goals--demonstrations, strikes, and
roadblocks--and yet it offered tacit support to other, more confrontational
tactics. The second of the new groups, the Tamil New Tigers (TNT), abandoned the
political process altogether and geared itself for violence. The TNT was founded
in 1972 by Velupillai Prabhakaran, an eighteen-year-old school dropout who was
the son of a minor government official. Both the name and the emblem of the new
group included the tiger, the traditional symbol of the ancient Tamil kingdoms
and one that clearly opposed the lion symbol of Sinhalese nationalism. Despite
this obvious ethnic affiliation, the TNT publicly espoused a Marxist ideology
and claimed to represent the oppressed of all ethnic groups.
In July 1975, the TNT gained wide public attention with the assassination of
the Tamil mayor of Jaffna, who had ordered the police to open fire on a Tamil
rights demonstration outside city hall. Except for this act of violence, the
activities of the TNT in this period are largely undocumented, and little
evidence exists of widespread public support for its violent methods. Moreover,
the prospects for a political solution had improved by 1976; the general
elections scheduled for 1977 offered hope that the fiercely pro-Sinhalese
Bandaranaike government could be ousted and replaced by the more moderate United
National Party. At the local level, the Tamil United Liberation Front, a
political party, spawned by the Tamil United Front, launched a major campaign
for a separate state in Tamil-dominated Northern and Eastern provinces.
The victory of the United National Party and the emergence of the Tamil
United Liberation Front as the leader of the parliamentary opposition seemed to
give substance to those political hopes. With the enactment of a new
constitution, however, it became clear that no major party could turn its back
on Sinhalese nationalism. In the Constitution of 1978, as in the previous one,
Sinhala remained the sole official language, Buddhism retained "the
foremost place" under law, and federal autonomy was denied the Tamil areas.
The political disillusionment that emerged in the early 1970s increased after
the 1977 elections and gained added impetus after the anti-Tamil riots of 1981
and 1983. A progressive radicalization of the Tamil population led to a growth
in the size and level of activity of militant groups, and the insurgency emerged
as a growing threat to the power of the government...
After the assassination of Jaffna's mayor in 1975, the militant groups
accelerated their campaign of violence and destabilization. Their early targets
included policemen, soldiers, and a number of Tamil politicians who were seen as
collaborators with the Sinhalese-dominated government. The attacks were
sporadic, relying largely on hit-and-run tactics.
In July 1983, the LTTE ambushed a military convoy in Northern Province,
killing thirteen soldiers. The attack sparked off a conflagration of communal
violence in which approximately 350 Tamils were killed and as many as 100,000
were forced to flee their homes. Indiscriminate violence by Sinhalese mobs and
members of the security forces led to insecurity and alienation among the Tamil
population, and support for the insurgency grew dramatically. The year 1984 was
marked by a substantial increase in terrorist attacks, and the militants turned
increasingly against civilian targets. Major incidents included an armed attack
against civilians in the ancient Sinhalese city of Anuradhapura (May 1985--146
dead); the detonation of a bomb aboard an Air Lanka jet at the Bandaranaike
International Airport (May 1986--20 dead); and a massive explosion at the Pettah
bus station in Colombo during rush hour (April 1987--110 dead).
As the Tamil movement grew and obtained more weapons, it changed tactics. A
full-fledged insurgency that could confront the armed forces replaced the
isolated terrorist incidents that had characterized the early period. By early
1986, the LTTE had won virtual control of the Jaffna Peninsula, confining the
army to military bases and taking over the day-to-day administration of the city
of Jaffna. In January 1987, the Tigers attempted to formalize their authority
over the peninsula by establishing an "Eelam Secretariat." LTTE
leaders claimed that this was intended simply to consolidate functions that the
insurgents were already performing, i.e., collecting taxes and operating basic
public services. Nonetheless, the government interpreted this move as a
unilateral declaration of independence and thus a challenge to governmental
authority.
In response, the government launched a major offensive against Jaffna in May
and June 1987. The security forces succeeded in destroying major insurgent bases
and regaining control of most of the peninsula, but at the cost of growing
political pressure from India. Reports of army brutality and high civilian
casualties among the Tamil population made the offensive increasingly
unacceptable to the Indian government, which had its own substantial Tamil
minority to worry about. In early June, Indian Air Force planes invaded Sri
Lankan airspace to drop relief supplies into embattled Tamil areas, sending a
message to the Sri Lankan government that the offensive would not be allowed to
continue. Within a week, the Sri Lankan government announced the successful
completion of its campaign.
On July 29, 1987, President Jayewardene signed an accord with India designed
to bring an end to the more than ten years of violence between the Sri Lankan
government and the Tamil minority. The accord provided for the disarming of
militant groups under the supervision of the Indian Peacekeeping Force and the
granting of limited autonomy to the primarily Tamil regions in Northern and
Eastern provinces. The terms of the accord provoked immediate criticism from a
number of directions. For Sinhalese nationalists, including several high-level
officials in Jayewardene's government, the agreement was a threat to the unitary
nature of Sri Lanka, virtually sanctioning a separate Tamil nation within the
island. Tamil militants questioned the basic validity of the accord; although
prime participants in the conflict, they had not been included in the
negotiations leading to the accord, and their later accession had been secured
under extreme pressure from the Indian government. For the wider community of
Tamils and Sinhalese, the presence of Indian troops, even in a peacekeeping
role, represented an unacceptable compromise of sovereignty.
These criticisms became increasingly acute when, in October 1987, the Tamil
militants and the Indian-Sri Lankan forces accused each other of violating the
accord, and the fighting resumed. Indian forces were expanded from an initial
3,000 troops to more than 70,000, and the Indian Peacekeeping Force launched a
major assault that succeeded in taking Jaffna in late October. Most of the insurgents managed to escape and,
according to press reports, regrouped in Mannar in Northern Province and in
Batticaloa and other areas of Eastern Province. Weakened and cut off from their
original bases and sources of supply, the Tigers were no longer able to conduct
positional warfare against the security forces, but they claimed that they would
continue their struggle through terrorist attacks.
The intervention of Indian forces in the north allowed the Sri Lankan Army to
concentrate on another crisis that was developing in the south; Sinhalese
nationalist opposition to the Indo-Sri Lankan Accord had turned violent,
breaking out in strikes and street demonstrations. In the midst of this
disorder, an old Sinhalese extremist organization was gaining in support and
threatened to launch its second bid for power.
|