|
In December 1972, Thanom announced a new interim constitution that provided
for a totally appointed legislative assembly, two- thirds of the members of
which would be drawn from the military and police. This move provoked widespread
protest, however, especially among students and led to Thanom's eventual
removal. In May and June 1973, students and workers rallied in the streets to
demand a more democratic constitution and genuine parliamentary elections. By
early October, there was renewed violence, protesting the detention of eleven
students arrested for handing out antigovernment pamphlets. The demonstrations
grew in size and scope as students demanded an end to the military dictatorship.
On October 13, more than 250,000 people rallied in Bangkok before the Democracy
Memorial, in the largest demonstration of its kind in Thai history, to press
their grievances against the government.
The next day troops opened fire on the demonstrators, killing seventy-five,
and occupied the campus of Thammasat University. King Bhumibol, who had been
seeking Thanom's ouster, took a direct role in dealing with the crisis in order
to prevent further bloodshed and called Thanom and his cabinet to Chitralada
Palace for talks. In the evening, the king went on television and radio to
announce a compromise solution: Thanom had resigned as prime minister but would
remain as supreme commander of the armed forces. In consultation with student
leaders, the king appointed Sanya Dharmasakti (Sanya Thammasak) as interim prime
minister, with instructions to draft a new constitution. Sanya, a civilian
conservative, was the rector of Thammasat University and known to be sympathetic
to the students' position. On October 15, Thanom, Praphat, and Narong--dubbed
Thailand's "three most hated men"-- were allowed to leave the country
in secret, the king overruling student militants who wanted to put them on
trial. Their departure was announced to the public only after they had left the
country, Praphat and Narong for Taiwan and Thanom initially for the United
States.
The student demonstrations of 1973 had not been intended as a prelude to a
revolution. They resulted, at least in part, from the frustration of large
numbers of students who were unable to fulfill professional expectations after
graduation, partly because university enrollment had increased dramatically in
the 1960s and early 1970s (see Education
and the Arts , ch. 2). Students were careful, however, to legitimize their
actions against the military dictatorship by an appeal to religion and the
monarchy, displaying in the streets the symbols of the "civic
religion"--figures of Buddha, pictures of the king, and the national flag.
Prime Minister Sanya gave full credit to the student movement for bringing
down the military dictatorship. At the state ceremony honoring those who had
been killed during the 1973 demonstrations, he pledged, "Their death has
brought us democracy which we will preserve forever." However, political
change in Thailand did not bring the shift to the left that had been hoped for
by some and feared by many. Student militants, who already felt betrayed by the
king's complicity in Thanom's escape, were not satisfied with the direction
taken by the new government, which seemed to have been preempted by the
professional politicians.
The new constitution, which went into effect in October 1974, called for a
popularly elected House of Representatives and elections within 120 days.
Political parties proliferated following the passage in 1974 of legislation
permitting their registration. As a result, the January 1975 parliamentary
elections were inconclusive. With forty-two officially sanctioned parties in the
field, none won a parliamentary majority. The parties for the most part had been
organized around familiar political personalities, and few had offered any
ideological base or even specific programs. Only 47 percent of eligible voters
cast ballots; public cynicism about politicians and improper management of voter
registration were blamed for the relatively low turnout. According to observers,
however, the election was not openly corrupt...
The overthrow of the Thanom regime had brought on a more vocal questioning of
ties with the United States. Nationalist sentiment, which was frequently
expressed in terms of anti- Americanism, ran high among students, who protested
alleged American involvement in domestic Thai affairs and called for the speedy
withdrawal of United States forces. Moreover, the changed geopolitical situation
in Southeast Asia refocused the issue of the United States presence. Many Thai
concluded that the country could not be reconciled with its communist neighbors
as long as United States personnel were stationed on Thai soil.
|